| Floor
Covering Industry White Paper Position Statement on Moisture Emission
Testing
FORWARD:
With the advent of rapid changes within the construction industry,
including but not limited to:
1.
The loss of asbestos as an ingredient in resilient flooring
2.
The loss of solvents from adhesive and coating systems
3.
Increased use of water to allow easier placement of concrete
4.
Absorptive aggregate in lightweight concrete
5.
Fast track construction schedules
Many
unforeseen problems have surfaced that have lead to unnecessary disputes,
increasing confusion and lawsuits. As an effort to reverse this trend, a
more science-based approach was needed to clearly identify contributory
problems associated with moisture-related flooring failures, with
reasonable expectations for those responsible for moisture testing.
To identify those
capable of moisture testing and the ancillary tests that may be
appropriate for identification and diagnoses, the following contributing
factors are to be considered within the evaluation and selection process
of an appropriate inspector and/or testing agency.
FACTORS TO
CONSIDER
Site Conditions:
It is important
that the selected testing personnel at least be familiar with site
conditions with a given building project.
Soil Conditions
Wet
Dry
Expansive
Non-expansive
Free Draining
Non free draining
Water table
Water table location (seasonality to its level and/or volume)
Inert
Contaminated
Under
slab Conditions-
Vapor retarder - yes
or no. Also note: type, location, properly installed, properly protected
during placement and subsequent construction.
Sub-base ,
Cut-
Fill
Blotter layer - note
if included or omitted. If included note if it is a cornpactable or noncompactable
type.
Screeding - Note whether screed stakes or form screeding was used.
Concrete:
Water to cement ratio of the mix design
Type and grade of aggregate
Time of transit from plant to site. Also note any delays, for any
reason.
Rotations used in each load.
Temperature of the concrete mix at time of delivery.
Slump at time of placement.
How much, if any, add water was used for delivery and placement of
the concrete mixture?
Water added to the aggregate (lightweight concrete). Was it
factored into the water to cement calculations?
Curing method: Curing agent, impermeable sheet, curing compounds,
none used. How long was the concrete cured?
Concrete finishing: hard troweled, power troweled, etc.
Admixtures: If used, what type (i.e. CaCl, fly ash, plasticizer,
water reducers, etc.)?
Building
Envelope Condition/Environment:
Temperature of room
Relative humidity of room
Concrete surface temperature
Air movement
SUMMARY
With all the
above referenced factors listed, it is unreasonable to expect a general
contractor. concrete contractor or a flooring installer to have sufficient
expertise to anticipate and ask the proper questions for evaluation of
potential concrete/flooring problems. Another complicating factor is that
each has a vested interest on the testing and/or performance outcome of
the installation.
Flooring
contractors should be made aware of test results, as all flooring
manufacturers have placed upward tolerable limits of moisture vapor
emission for the installation of their products. most have also recognized
that adhesives will cure within a moderate range of pH. However, flooring
contractors expertise should, by requirement, be limited to flooring
materials and their installation. Changes in construction materials and
practices should not lead to a mandatory in depth expertise of all the
disciplines mentioned above.
It is
therefore our recommendation that concrete moisture vapor emission testing
be performed by qualified independent agencies.
DATED:
10/25/2001
FLOOR
COVERING INDUSTRY WHITE PAPER POSITION STATEMENT ON MOISTURE EMISSION TESTING
|